NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 OEM and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
5040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
0.874 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT
+7281%
64.51 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 400
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
84
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
5376
56
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
36.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
873.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
72.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
Navi 31
GF104-325-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
