NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon HD 6390
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6390 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon HD 6390 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (39W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
+69%
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6390
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
289W
TDP
39W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Redwood
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Redwood LE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
