NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT
+2712%
19.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
220W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 48
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
