NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
19216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+11442%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
512bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
750W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
153 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
