NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (106W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+56%
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
3
240
Shading Units
144
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
106W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF116
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
