NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+785%
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
80
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
204W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
M93
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
