NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs ATI FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (127W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+84%
0.708 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
204W
TDP
127W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
R600
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
R600 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
