NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs ATI FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+268%
0.708 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
204W
TDP
89W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
RV630
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
