NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
+1086%
8.397 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
204W
TDP
130W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-256
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
