NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+2445%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-512
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
