NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
10512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
A40 PCIe
+5185%
37.42 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
84
240
Shading Units
10752
80
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA102
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
