NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs Intel Arc A580
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 8GB VRAM Arc A580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
Arc A580
+1723%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1700 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
3072
80
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
24
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.536 TFLOPS
Board Design
219W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-512
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
