Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +1184%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
240
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Capsaicin
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

219W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy