NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX570 A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1155MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
1936 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
GeForce MX570 A
+1436%
4.731 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2022
GeForce 200M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
832 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
112
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.20 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.731 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.731 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
73.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GA107
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
MX570
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
Unknown
324 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
