NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD FirePro W4150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4150M 's Advantages
Boost Clock850MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
FirePro W4150M
+111%
0.652 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
850 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.800 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
652.8 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Mars
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
