NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
24 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
+12%
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
448bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
27
192
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
28
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
182W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
GT200
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
