Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +322%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
18
192
Shading Units
1440
64
TMUs
72
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Cypress
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy