NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
RTX A4000H
+3476%
19.17 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
27
SM Count
48
216
Shading Units
6144
72
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
182W
TDP
140W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
GA104
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
