NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs ATI Radeon X1050 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 120W)
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
24W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV360
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.06 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
76 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0 (9_0)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-
