Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1770MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (85W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +28%
5.437 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
1536
Shading Units
1280
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

120W
TDP
85W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy