NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+1039%
5.437 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
24
1536
Shading Units
192
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT200B
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
