NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+11982%
5.437 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
1536
Shading Units
16
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT218
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
