NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+967%
4.101 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285M
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
128
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX1-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
