NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro M5800
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1136 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+688%
4.101 TFLOPS
FirePro M5800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Mar 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
400
96
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
26W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Madison
-
GPU Variant
Madison XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
