NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro M3100
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (1335MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+663%
4.101 TFLOPS
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.80 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
537.6 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
