NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+318%
5.027 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
800
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV770
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
