NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X800 GTO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 75W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
R423
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
R423 GTO
Turing
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
289 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-
