NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 176W)

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 1 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 58% (2635MHz vs 1665MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)

1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650

2.984 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 6650 XT +261%

10.79 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 1650

3596

Radeon RX 6650 XT +175%

9902

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 1650

12

Radeon RX 6650 XT +216%

38

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 1650

28

Radeon RX 6650 XT +175%

77

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 1650

42

Radeon RX 6650 XT +183%

119

Battlefield 5 2160p

GeForce GTX 1650

21

Radeon RX 6650 XT +161%

55

Battlefield 5 1440p

GeForce GTX 1650

46

Radeon RX 6650 XT +141%

111

Battlefield 5 1080p

GeForce GTX 1650

63

Radeon RX 6650 XT +149%

157

GTA 5 2160p

GeForce GTX 1650

28

Radeon RX 6650 XT +128%

64

GTA 5 1440p

GeForce GTX 1650

30

Radeon RX 6650 XT +183%

85

GTA 5 1080p

GeForce GTX 1650

100

Radeon RX 6650 XT +50%

150

GeForce GTX 1650

VS

Radeon RX 6650 XT

Graphics Card

Apr 2019

Release Date

May 2022

GeForce 16

Generation

Navi II

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz

Base Clock

2055 MHz

1665 MHz

Boost Clock

2635 MHz

2001 MHz

Memory Clock

2190 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

128.1GB/s

Bandwidth

280.3GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

-

Compute Units

32

896

Shading Units

2048

56

TMUs

128

32

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

32

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

1024 KB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

168.6 GPixel/s

93.24 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

337.3 GTexel/s

5.967 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

21.59 TFLOPS

2.984 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.79 TFLOPS

93.24 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

674.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117

GPU Name

Navi 23

TU117-300-A1

GPU Variant

Navi 23 KXT (215-130000136)

Turing

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

7 nm

4.7 billion

Transistors

11.06 billion

200 mm²

Die Size

237 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

176W

250 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T1000

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

7

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X