Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +10%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Tonga
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy