NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1665MHz vs 1600MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520
+147%
7.373 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2304
56
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 12
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 12
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
