NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA P104 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM P104 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
NVIDIA P104 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1733MHz vs 1665MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
P104 100
+123%
6.655 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
3566
P104 100
+52%
5439
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650
1606
P104 100
+69%
2718
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2017
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
15
896
Shading Units
1920
56
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
208.0 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
104.0 GFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.655 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
208.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GP104
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GP104-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
