NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA P102 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1683MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
P102 100
+260%
10.77 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
3566
P102 100
+97%
7042
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650
1606
P102 100
+137%
3817
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2018
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
25
896
Shading Units
3200
56
TMUs
200
32
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GP102
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
