NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM NVS 1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+875%
2.984 TFLOPS
NVS 1000
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK107
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
