NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 85W)
Moore Threads MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
MTT S50
+64%
4.915 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce 16
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
14
SM Count
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
