Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +45%
2.984 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jul 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net