Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1665MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +25%
2.984 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG1
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy