Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1665MHz vs 1216MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 980 +66%
4.981 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
3596
GeForce GTX 980 +20%
4330
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650
12
GeForce GTX 980 +50%
18
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650
28
GeForce GTX 980 +25%
35
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650
42
GeForce GTX 980 +47%
62
GTA 5 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650
28
GeForce GTX 980 +114%
60
GTA 5 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650
30
GeForce GTX 980 +106%
62
GTA 5 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650
100
GeForce GTX 980
100
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1127 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1216 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.82 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
155.6 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.981 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
155.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GM204
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GM204-400-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy