NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+456%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
27
896
Shading Units
216
56
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT200
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
