NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FireGL V7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+500%
2.984 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV670
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
