NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1665MHz vs 1545MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (10GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
+270%
11.07 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
56
896
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU102
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
