NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
+41%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Amethyst
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
