NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+540%
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV730
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
