NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1532MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+108%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+213%
3150
GeForce MX150
1004
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+610%
1429
GeForce MX150
201
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
May 2017
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GP108
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1
(N17S-G1-A1)
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
