NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce G103M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM GeForce G103M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce G103M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+9353%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce G103M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Sep 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.560 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
14W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G98
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N10M-GE2-S
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
