NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce 940M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1200MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+118%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce 940M
1.124 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+521%
3150
GeForce 940M
507
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+1090%
1429
GeForce 940M
120
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
1020 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.14 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1124 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.14 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GM107
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N16S-GT1-KB-B
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
