NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+2134%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+4275%
3150
GeForce 410M
72
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.148 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.592 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
110.1 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.176 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF119
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N12M-GS
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
