NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (2087MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X
+262%
16.03 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
596
Radeon Pro W6800X
+138%
1424
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1800 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
3840
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Apple MPX
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Navi 21
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
