NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 A240
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1515MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
+370%
3.103 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 A240
0.659 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1380 MHz
Base Clock
-
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Jet
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
Jet XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
