NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA NVS 5100M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+1886%
2.304 TFLOPS
NVS 5100M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT216
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
N10P-NS
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
