NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce MX550 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1320MHz vs 1125MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2.304 TFLOPS
GeForce MX550
+17%
2.703 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+23%
2932
GeForce MX550
2375
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+200%
1318
GeForce MX550
438
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+70%
398
GeForce MX550
234
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1320 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.12 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.24 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.703 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.703 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU117
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
MX550
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
